safety-compliance-workshop Technology Handbooks Canadian ElectronicsDPN MagazineSoftware Directory
May 10, 2015 - AutomationDirect’s PN series inductive proximity sensors are IP 69K-rated short-body sensors with metal housings. These three-wire 10-30 VDC sensors are equipped with LED status indicators and are available with an attached two-meter output cable or M12 quick-disconnect. All styles are available with shielded or unshielded housings as well as normally-open or normally-closed and PNP or NPN output types. Backed with a lifetime warranty, PN series sensors are CE and RoHS approved; sensors with M12 quick disconnects are also cULus approved and sensors with two-meter cables are also UL approved.
Apr. 9, 2015 - OleumTech, a manufacturer of wireless industrial automation systems, has launched the DH3 Ethernet Wireless Gateway with AES encryption for securing RF traffic. The new wireless gateway is a primary data collection point for OleumTech Wireless Automation Networks, offering remote viewing of Modbus data, data logging and trending capabilities and Ethernet connectivity. According to the company, it is an optimal solution for eliminating costly conduit and wiring while enabling 24/7 monitoring and control of process conditions. Other benefits include improved safety, improved reliability, and on-site and remote access to logged data, says OleumTech.
Feb. 1, 2015 - AutomationDirect’s APS series inductive proximity sensors are IP67-rated rectangular compact DC sensors available in top or front sensing models with 2.5 mm and 4 mm sensing ranges.
Jan. 19, 2015 - The LR-19 series of inductive linear position sensors has been added to Alliance Sensors Group’s product offering.
Jan. 19, 2015 - Pepperl+Fuchs says its IO series of ultrasonic sensors establish a new level of versatility and convenience with simple pushbutton programming that provides fast and easy on-site sensor parameterization without requiring any software.
Dec. 12, 2014 - Alliance Sensors Group has announced the ME series linear position sensors for embedded use in measuring the ram position of hydraulic and pneumatic cylinders in industrial, mobile or subsea applications. Designed to be drop-in form, fit, and function replacements for embedded magnetostrictive sensors, the series offers more robust construction and a lower cost of ownership, says the company.
The HART Communication Foundation welcomes the recent report and confirmation by NAMUR that WirelessHART technology meets the requirements for wireless sensor networks in process applications. After conducting an extensive multi-vendor field test, NAMUR reports that WirelessHART Communication provides the flexibility, security, robust performance, coexistence with other radio technologies and device interoperability within a WirelessHART network that its members should expect. 
The NAMUR field test used WirelessHART products from ABB, Emerson Process Management, Endress+Hauser, MACTek, Pepperl+Fuchs and Siemens to evaluate and verify WirelessHART compliance with NAMUR Recommendation NE124, "Requirements for Wireless Automation" and NAMUR Working Document NA115, “IT Security for Process Automation Systems.” The field test conducted at the BASF facility in Ludwigshafen, Germany, included laboratory evaluation of performance characteristics and several implementations in operating process plant environments.
"Our tests prove that WirelessHART is an appropriate technology for applications within the NAMUR use class ‘Monitoring’ for wireless sensor networks," reports Martin Schwibach, senior automation manager for BASF and chairman of the NAMUR AK4.15 Wireless Automation Working Group responsible for the field test. "WirelessHART technology provides a good alternative where wired networks are too expensive or too difficult to install. This field test verified the alignment of the WirelessHART standard with the NAMUR requirements for wireless automation in process applications." 
Founded in Germany in 1949, NAMUR is an international user association of 121 member companies in the chemical/pharmaceutical processing industry. NAMUR represents approximately 15,000 PCS experts, of whom approximately 300 are active in 33 working groups covering the fields of measurement and control, automation, communication, process control and electrical engineering over the entire lifecycle of systems.
"We are delighted that the NAMUR field test showed WirelessHART meets user needs," says HART Communication Foundation executive director Ron Helson. "Other user installations have also proven the capabilities of WirelessHART, a technology designed specifically for process applications that builds on experience gained with millions of wired HART devices installed around the world. We look forward to working with NAMUR and others to continue improving the technology and extend its benefits to even more users worldwide." 
The WirelessHART standard is an evolutionary enhancement to the HART Communication Protocol, the leading communication technology for intelligent process measurement and control field devices and systems with more than 30 million devices installed worldwide. The WirelessHART technology is backward compatible with currently installed HART devices, is supported by existing HART tools, and provides additional capabilities to access asset management information in both existing and new monitoring and control applications. 
The HART Communication Foundation is an international, not-for-profit, membership organization supported by more than 230 companies worldwide. Founded in 1993, the Foundation is the technology owner, standards setting body and central authority on the HART Protocol and provides global support for application of the HART technology. The Foundation establishes and controls the HART Communication standards including new developments and technology enhancements that benefit and support the needs of the industry.
The widespread deployment of ZigBee networks in industrial applications may be coming sooner than anyone expected.

The low-power wireless sensor and control networks are extending the capabilities of factory automation systems to physical spaces and functions never before possible. Recently released studies by research firms like Harbor Research (, On World ( and ABI Research ( predict a rapid acceleration in the adoption of this technology over the next 12 to 36 months.

A major catalyst for this adoption is an upcoming wave of new ZigBee products. Over the past few years, more than a quarter billion dollars of investment has been put into development of the underlying technology for these wireless networks, including low-power, low-cost silicon; ZigBee-compliant network stacks; and development tools. This investment has allowed major OEMs to standardize on ZigBee, and soon they will begin pushing these products to market. The availability of these products will provide companies with the hardware components necessary to move forward with ZigBee deployment projects on the factory floor.

Other key factors that will accelerate the deployment of ZigBee applications are corporate initiatives focused on energy management and stringent operational standards, which are supported by the capabilities of ZigBee.

Putting ZigBee to work
The expected applications of ZigBee include energy management, advanced process control, safety enhancement, machine monitoring and maintenance, as well as temperature and vibration monitoring. But how do you get these wireless applications to work in production operations?

It is important to begin discussing this issue now because there are some critical hurdles and challenges that organizations will run up against when they move forward with their deployments. To help with the transition from wired to wireless, there are a number of questions that manufacturers need to ask themselves.

Key questions - DEPLOYMENT
Before deploying and commissioning ZigBee networks, manufacturers must first consider:
• How do I plan for the quantity and placement of the wireless devices in the venue, particularly when the existing staff has little experience deploying wireless RF devices?
• How do I create a ZigBee application that can be installed by an electrician or other professional who is typically in charge of wired installations?
• How do I create a system whose installation begins on-site by an electrician and is completed by a specialist remotely?
• How do I embed enough automatic capability in ZigBee devices so that they can operate effectively, securely and easily at the time of the device's commissioning?
• How does the installation team establish a simple way of binding each wireless device to the location where it is installed, so that both the device and the application understand the device's functional placement and role?

One common thread that runs through each of these questions is the issue of how to successfully deploy a wireless application using the same team that is responsible for the traditional wired sensors and actuators. Very few of the teams that currently oversee wired sensor networks in industrial settings have extensive experience working with RF devices, and most companies will not have the luxury of an RF-trained engineer to support every step of a ZigBee application deployment. This presents a significant obstacle to ZigBee deployments, which is different than the installation process for wired sensors. Wireless enables freedom of choice, and that will lead to a larger volume of wireless devices. In turn, this means that most of the wireless devices will have to have a level of automated intelligence embedded in them to enable easy commissioning and flexible use. Addressing these challenges will require advanced planning to automate deployment issues faced by the people who will actually have responsibility for installing the ZigBee application.

When building ZigBee applications, organizations must ask themselves:
• How can I get all the disparate components of a ZigBee network to operate as a unified system?
• How can I accelerate integration of the ZigBee application with other systems within the facility so that it becomes a fully integrated extension of the company's technology infrastructure?
• How do I build the network with automated functionality and network intelligence that addresses the lack of a human interface on most of the devices within a ZigBee network?

One of the most compelling and powerful characteristics of ZigBee applications is that they connect device capability in ways that have previously been impossible to accomplish or even to imagine. That strength of the technology also causes new operational challenges because these applications bring together devices and technologies that have previously not worked together. The process of making these disparate components talk to one another and operate as a unified system is daunting and often requires expertise in atypical areas of technology. Planning ahead to select devices and components that minimize these interoperability issues is very important. Likewise, it will be valuable to have processes and technologies that will help automate the process of building out the application and overcoming interoperability snags that occur along the way.

To manage a wireless network's health and performance, manufacturers have to think about:
• How can I proactively manage the network to ensure reliability and performance?
• How do I dynamically monitor and manage radio consumption to conserve battery power in wireless devices?
• How do I run diagnostics when there is a network performance issue?
• How do I manage network load between different channels or subnets?
• If I have redundancy in the network, in order to maximize reliability, how do I manage the network in real time to deal with issues such as interference and switching channels to improve performance?

One of the things that will catch many organizations by surprise is the difference between wired and wireless networks when it comes to management and maintenance. The diagnostic process, for example, is different for a wired network than for a wireless one. Whereas troubleshooting a failure in a wired device is limited to examination of elements within sub-sections of a wired circuit, performance issues with a wireless device have multiple potential causes and the deductive process of identifying the true cause is complex. More importantly, the network itself must be imbued with the automated intelligence to handle these monitoring and management chores. This will create unforeseen changes for technical teams who are experts in wired systems, but new to wireless networks.

Security is an important consideration for wireless networks. To ensure the network is secure, organizations must ask themselves:
• How do I ensure that a wireless device is appropriately secured for the application and the function? And how do I begin that device's life in a secure fashion?
• How do I put a system in place that allows that security scheme to be flexible and secure?
• How do I build easy-to-design-and-manage capabilities into the network that establish a hierarchy of access that aligns access privileges with the functional uses of an application?

The question is not whether wireless can be secure; ZigBee networks can and do meet the stringent security requirements at the network level in industrial settings. The question instead is how to make them secure in the application context that not only achieves a user's security objectives, but also provides a flexible platform that supports different purposes of the device and the needs of the organization over time. Advanced work is critical for achieving these twin objectives of security and flexibility.

Looking ahead
The questions outlined here are by no means exhaustive. They are meant to provide a starting point for the process that an organization will embark on as it begins planning its wireless deployment. The operational challenges that companies face in building, deploying and managing wireless technologies are real. Advanced planning will help overcome these challenges. Companies need to maximize the level of automated intelligence built into these devices, to minimize the complexity of living with these applications day-to-day once they are operational in production settings.

Tim Enwall is the founder and chief operating officer of Tendril, a provider of network operating platform software for building, deploying and managing ZigBee networks. He can be reached at 303-951-4361 or This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .
Friday April 22, 2005

Photoelectric sensors

ImageThe Space Pak - a new generation of self-contained photoelectric sensors - designed in our R&D division in USA and manufactured in Denmark - providing the total sensor concept. It is designed especially with the packaging industry in mind where high performance, precision and reliability are essential.

Multithumb found errors on this page:

There was a problem loading image /data/automationmag/public_html/images/stories/ProductsMarch2005/Pepperl Fuchsa.jpg
There was a problem loading image /data/automationmag/public_html/images/stories/ProductsMarch2005/Pepperl Fuchsa.jpg
ImagePepperl+Fuchs introduces Tru-Vue series photoelectric sensors. These compact, low-cost sensors feature four-in-one output for simplified sensor specification and stocking, flexible side-mount or nose-mount options to satisfy various application needs, and highly visible 360-degree LED indicators for status indication in all directions, and from poor vantage points. Made in the U.S., Tru-Vue sensors are well suited for material handling, conveyor and assembly applications. Rather than having to stock multiple sensors with different outputs, Tru-Vue's four-in-one output options (NPN light on, NPN dark on, PNP light on, PNP dark on) allow the engineer to specify and stock a single part for a given application. These sensors can be surface mounted, or can be mounted like 18-millimetre cylindrical sensors due to the threaded nose. Additionally their compact housing and barrel length makes them flexible enough to be mounted where conventional 18-millimetre cylindrical sensors cannot. Pepperl+Fuchs
Page 1 of 2